Analytical mechanics
Motion in a central field, the Kepler problem
The Kepler problem describes motion under an inverse-square gravitational potential. Symmetry reduces it to radial dynamics and classifies trajectories as ellipses, parabolas, or hyperbolas.
In the central potential V(r)=−κ/r, angular momentum is conserved. The orbit lies in a plane and is determined by energy E and angular momentum L.
Definition: Effective potential and orbit
The reduced mass μ moves with angular momentum L. The effective potential combines the centrifugal barrier and attraction. For the Kepler orbit is a bound ellipse; is the escape parabola; gives a hyperbola. These results assume the Newtonian two-body problem without significant perturbations.
From Hamilton–Jacobi to orbits
The Hamilton–Jacobi equation determines the principal action. In a static Kepler field, separation in polar coordinates uses energy and angular momentum as constants; derivatives of S with respect to these constants yield the motion. The displayed S surface is only an illustration of a simplified solution, not a universal surface shared by all Kepler orbits.
Example: Example
A bound Kepler orbit is an ellipse with eccentricity e=0.6 and semimajor axis a=10⁷ m, with the focus at the origin. Find the periapsis and apoapsis distances.
Solution
For a Kepler ellipse, r_min=a(1−e) and r_max=a(1+e). Thus r_min=4×10⁶ m and r_max=1.6×10⁷ m. Their sum is 2a, as expected geometrically.
Quick check
In polar coordinates the effective potential is . The centrifugal term creates a barrier as , while gravity attracts the particle; the minimum gives a circular orbit of radius . For bound energy , the orbit is an ellipse with semimajor axis . At it is parabolic, and for it is hyperbolic. These formulas use the reduced mass for the two-body problem; a fixed central mass is the limiting approximation.
For V(r)=−κ/r, what type of orbit corresponds to total energy E<0?
For an autonomous system, which quantity is conserved along Hamiltonian motion?
References
- Herbert Goldstein, Charles Poole, John Safko (2002). Classical Mechanics
- L. D. Landau, E. M. Lifshitz (1976). Mechanics